DEPARTMENT OF THE NAVY
BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF NAVAL RECORDS
701 S. COURTHOUSE ROAD, SUITE 1004
ARLINGTON, VA 22204-2490
BUG
Docket No: 10191-12
25 March 2013
From: Chairman, Board for Correction of Naval Records
TOs Secretary of the Navy
Sub; : =i i
REVIEW OF NAVAL RECORD
Ret: (a) Title 10 U.S.€. 1552
Encl: (1) DD Form 149 dtd 31 Aug 12 w/attachments
(2) HOMC MIQ memo dtd 19 Dec 12
(3) Subject’s naval record
1. Pursuant to the provisions of reference (a), Subject
hereinafter referred to as Petitioner, filed written
application, enclosure (1), with this Board requesting, in
effect, that his naval record be corrected by removing the
service record page 11 (“Administrative Remarks (1070)"”) entry
dated 13 September 2011 (copy at Tab A).
2. The Board, consisting of Messrs. Genteman and Marquez and
Ms. Zivnuska, reviewed Petitioner’s allegations of error and
injustice on 21 March 2013, and pursuant to its regulations,
determined that the corrective action indicated below should be
taken on the available evidence of record. Documentary material
considered by the Board consisted of the enclosures, naval
records, and applicable statutes, regulations and policies.
3. The Board, having reviewed all the facts of record
pertaining to Petitioner’s allegations of error and injustice,
finds as follows:
a. Before applying to the Board, Petitioner exhausted all
administrative remedies which were available under existing law
and regulations within the Department of the Navy.
b. In enclosure (2), the Headquarters Marine Corps office
with cognizance over the subject matter of Petitioner’s case has
commented to the effect that the request has merit and warrants
favorable action.
—— — ———EE ————————eea
CONCLUSION:
Upon review and consideration of all the evidence of record, and
especially in light of enclosure (2), the Board finds an error
and injustice warranting the following corrective action:
RECOMMENDATION :
a. That Petitioner's naval record be corrected by
removing the service record page 11 (“Administrative Remarks
(1070)”) entry dated 13 September 2011. This is to be
accomplished by physically removing the page 11 on which the
entry appears, or completely obliterating the entry so it cannot
be read, rather than merely lining through it.
b. That any material or entries inconsistent with or
relating to the Board’s recommendation be corrected, removed or
completely expunged from Petitioner’s record and that no such
entries or material be added to the record in the future.
c. That any material directed to be removed from
Petitioner's naval record be returned to the Board, together
with a copy of this Report of Proceedings, for retention ina
confidential file maintained for such purpose, with no cross
reference being made a part of Petitioner’s naval record.
4. Pursuant to Section 6(c) of the revised Procedures of the
Board for Correction of Naval Records (32 Code of Federal
Regulations, Section 723.6(c)) it is certified that a quorum was
present at the Board’s review and deliberations, and that the
foregoing is a true and complete record of the Board’s
proceedings in the above entitled matter.
Sortie J Nh atbor3By
ROBERT D. Z4SALMAN JONATHAN S. RUSKIN
Recorder Acting Recorder
5. Pursuant to the delegation of authority set out in Section
6(e) of the revised Procedures of the Board for Correction of
Naval Records (32 Code of Federal Regulations, Section 723.6 (e))
and having assured compliance with its provisions, it is hereby
announced that the foregoing corrective action, taken under the
authority of reference (a), has been approved by the Board on
behalf of the Secretary of the Navy.
sew Sy Sg Dreiesa
ROBERT D. 4Z4SALMAN
Acting Executive Director
NAVY | BCNR | CY2013 | NR3743-13
Finally, by implication, he also requested removing the page 11 entry dated 3 August 2011. The Board, consisting of Ms. Lapinski and Messrs. Gorenflo and Hicks, reviewed Petitioner's allegations of error and injustice on 13 March 2014, and pursuant to its regulations, determined that the corrective action indicated below should be taken on the available evidence of record. That Petitioner's naval record be corrected by removing the service record page 11(b) (“Administrative Remarks...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2012 | 11847 12
Pursuant to the provisions of reference (a), Subject, hereinafter referred to as Petitioner, filed enclosure (1) with this Board requesting, in effect, that the applicable naval record be corrected by removing the service record page 11 (“Administrative Remarks (1070)") entry dated 27 October 2012 and his rebuttal of the same date, copies of which are at Tab A. The Board, consisting of Ms. Zivnuska and Messrs. Genteman and Marquez, reviewed Petitioner's allegations of error and injustice on...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2013 | NR8361 13
Pursuant to the provisions of reference (a), Subject, hereinafter referred to as Petitioner, filed enclosure (1) with this Board requesting, in effect, that the applicable naval record be corrected by removing the service record page 11 (“Administrative Remarks (1070)") entries dated 30 September 2013 with his rebuttal of the same date (neither of which is in his Official Military Personnel File) and 10 October 2013 with his rebuttal of the same date (copies at Tab A). The Board, consisting...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2014 | NR2570 14
The Board, consisting of Messrs. Chapman, Koman and Spain, reviewed Petitioner's allegations of error and injustice on & January 2015, and pursuant to its regulations, determined that the corrective action indicated below should be taken on the available evidence of record. CONCLUSION: Upon review and consideration of all the evidence of record, and especially in light of the contents of enclosures (4) and (5), the Board finds the existence of an error and injustice warranting the following...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2014 | NR2410 14
Pursuant to the provisions of reference (a), ‘Subject, hereinafter referred to as Petitioner, filed enclosure (1) with this Board requesting, in effect, that the applicable naval record be corrected by removing the service record page 11 (“Administrative Remarks (1070)") entry dated 23 February 2011 and his rebuttal of the same date, copies of which are at Tab A. The Board, consisting of Messrs. Genteman, Iving and Sproul, reviewed Petitioner's allegations of error and injustice on 1’ July...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2012 | 05946-12
DEPARTMENT OF THE NAVY BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF NAVAL RECORDS 701 S. COURTHOUSE ROAD, SUITE 1001 ARLINGTON, VA 22204-2490 BUG Docket No: 5946-12 25 September 2012 From: Chairman, Board for Correction of Naval Records Te: Secretary of the Navy i de REVIEW OF NAVAL RECORD Ref: (4) Tatle 10 U.S.C. Pursuant to the provisions of reference (a), Subject hereinafter referred to as Petitioner, filed written application, enclosure (1), with this Board requesting, in effect, that her naval record be...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2013 | NR4525 13
Pursuant to the provisions of reference (a), Subject, hereinafter referred to as Petitioner, filed enclosure (1) with this Board requesting, in effect, that the applicable naval record be corrected by removing the service record page 11 (“Administrative Remarks (1070)”) entry dated 9 September 2011, a copy of which is at Tab A. The Board, consisting of Messrs. Boyd, Genteman and Spain, reviewed Petitioner's allegations of error and injustice on 17 April 2014, and pursuant to its...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2012 | 12640 12
The Board, consisting of Messrs. Clemmons, Gorenflo and Midboe, reviewed Petitioner's allegations of error and injustice on 24 January 2013, and pursuant to its regulations, determined that the corrective action indicated below should be taken on the available evidence of record. That Petitioner's naval record be corrected by removing the service record page 11(b) (“Administrative Remarks (1070) ") entry dated 5 August >010 and his undated rebuttal. d. That any material directed to be...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2011 | 05747-11
(a), Subject hereinafter referred to as Petitioner, filed written application, enclosure (1), with this Board requesting, in effect, that her naval record be corrected by removing the service record page 11 (“Administrative Remarks (1070)”) entry dated 13 June 2008, a copy of which is at enclosure (1). The Board, consisting of Messrs. Gorenflo, Storz and Whalen, reviewed Petitioner’s allegations of error and injustice on 28 July 2011, and pursuant to its regulations, determined that the...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2012 | 03944-12
The Board, consisting of Ms. White-Olson and Messrs. Gattis and Silberman, reviewed Petitioner’s allegations of error and injustice on 30 August 2012, and pursuant to its regulations, determined that the limited corrective action indicated below should be taken on the available evidence of record. That Petitioner’s naval record be corrected by removing the service record page 11 (“Administrative Remarks (1070)") entry dated 11 February 9011. c. That any material or entries inconsistent...